home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
AOL File Library: 9,300 to 9,399
/
9300.zip
/
AOLDLs
/
March
/
March 17.txt
/
MARCH17.txt
< prev
Wrap
Text File
|
2014-12-11
|
77KB
|
2,045 lines
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA; FRIDAY, MARCH 17, 1995
10:11 A.M.
DEPARTMENT NO. 103 HON. LANCE A. ITO, JUDGE
APPEARANCES:
(APPEARANCES AS HERETOFORE NOTED.)
(JANET M. MOXHAM, CSR NO. 4855, OFFICIAL REPORTER.)
(CHRISTINE M. OLSON, CSR NO. 2378, OFFICIAL REPORTER.)
(PAGES 19228 THROUGH 19233,
VOLUME 109A, TRANSCRIBED AND
SEALED UNDER SEPARATE COVER.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT, OUT OF THE
PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL.
MS. CLARK: MAY WE SEE YOU JUST ONE SECOND?
THE COURT: DO YOU WANT THE REPORTER?
MS. CLARK: NO.
(A CONFERENCE WAS HELD AT THE
BENCH, NOT REPORTED.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, COUNSEL.
BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. THE
DEFENDANT IS AGAIN PRESENT WITH HIS COUNSEL, MR. SHAPIRO,
MR. COCHRAN, MR. KARDASHIAN, MR. DOUGLAS AND MR. BAILEY.
THE PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED BY MISS CLARK AND
MR. DARDEN.
THE JURY IS NOT PRESENT.
WE NEED TO TAKE UP TWO MATTERS.
FIRST OF ALL, THE COURT HAS FOUND ABUNDANT GOOD
CAUSE TO EXCUSE JUROR NO. 602 AND WE WILL BE REPLACING
JUROR NO. 602 WHEN THE JURY JOINS US.
I'M GOING TO DIRECT -- EXCUSE ME, MR. COCHRAN.
CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION, PLEASE.
MISS CLARK.
I'M GOING TO INSTRUCT COUNSEL NOT TO DISCUSS
PUBLICLY IN ANY MANNER THE PROCEEDING THAT WENT ON IN
CHAMBERS THIS MORNING REGARDING THE EXCUSAL OF THIS JUROR
UNTIL THE MATTER HAS BEEN CONCLUDED.
MR. COCHRAN: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
ANY OTHER COMMENT? MY RECOLLECTION IS THAT THE
EXCUSAL WAS WITH THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES.
MR. COCHRAN: THAT IS TRUE, YOUR HONOR.
MS. CLARK: THAT'S CORRECT. THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION
FROM EITHER SIDE.
MR. COCHRAN: THAT IS TRUE, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
SECONDLY, WE HAVE A TAPE THAT NEEDS TO BE
DISPLAYED TO THE DEFENSE.
MR. DARDEN: THAT'S CORRECT, YOUR HONOR. WE HAVE A
VIDEOTAPE.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, MR. DARDEN.
MR. DARDEN: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
THE VIDEOTAPE OF DETECTIVE VANNATTER DRIVING
FROM BUNDY TO ROCKINGHAM AND BACK. HE IS ATTEMPTING TO
APPROXIMATE THE TIME IT WOULD TAKE.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. IF WE COULD PLAY THAT FOR THE
DEFENSE.
(AT 10:16 A.M. A VIDEOTAPE,
WAS PLAYED.)
(AT 10:22 A.M. THE PLAYING
OF THE VIDEOTAPE CONCLUDED.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. MR. DARDEN, IS THAT THE
COMPLETE TAPE?
MR. DARDEN: THAT IS, YOUR HONOR.
MAY I HAVE ONE MOMENT? THERE IS A SECOND PART
WHICH IS ON LASER AND THAT IS THE TRIP FROM BUNDY BACK TO
ROCKINGHAM.
THE COURT: ONE IS ON VIDEO AND ONE IS ON LASER. ALL
RIGHT.
MR. DARDEN: GOING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, YOUR
HONOR.
THE COURT: DOES THAT MEAN IT IS FASTER?
MR. DARDEN: PERHAPS WE SHOULD MARK THE VIDEOTAPE
PEOPLE'S NEXT IN ORDER.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. HOW ABOUT THE VIDEOTAPE AS
118 AND THE LASER AS 119.
(PEO'S 118 FOR ID = VIDEOTAPE/ROCKINGHAM TO BUNDY)
(PEO'S 119 FOR ID = VIDEOTAPE/BUNDY TO ROCKINGHAM)
(AT 10:25 A.M., PEOPLE'S EXHIBIT
118, A VIDEOTAPE, WAS PLAYED.)
MR. COCHRAN: YOUR HONOR, THE AUDIO? CAN WE START
THAT OVER WITH THE AUDIO.
THE COURT: EXCUSE ME, MR. DARDEN. CAN YOU HOLD ON
TO THAT, PLEASE.
THIS APPEARS TO BE THE SAME SEQUENCE STARTING
AT THE ASHFORD GATE.
IT APPEARED --
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
(AT 10:26 A.M., PEOPLE'S EXHIBIT
119, A VIDEOTAPE, WAS PLAYED.)
(AT 10:31 A.M. THE PLAYING OF
THE VIDEOTAPE CONCLUDED.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. MR. DARDEN, ARE THOSE THE TWO
CLIPS YOU WISH TO EXHIBIT TO THE JURY?
MR. DARDEN: YES, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. ANY COMMENT FROM THE DEFENSE?
MR. SHAPIRO: NO, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE INVITE THE JURORS TO
JOIN US?
ALL RIGHT. DEPUTY MAGNERA, LET'S HAVE THE
JURY, PLEASE.
MADAM REPORTER, WE ARE GOING TO GO STRAIGHT
THROUGH.
THE REPORTER: YES.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT, IN THE
PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. PLEASE BE SEATED, LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN.
ALL RIGHT. MRS. ROBERTSON, WOULD YOU PLEASE
DRAW A NUMBER FROM OUR LIST OF ALTERNATE JURORS.
THE CLERK: JUROR NO. 1290, WILL YOU PLEASE HAVE A
SEAT IN SEAT NO. 3.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN.
THE JURY: GOOD MORNING.
THE COURT: MY APOLOGIES TO YOU AGAIN. THIS IS HOW
WE START OFF EVERY MORNING. MY APOLOGIES TO YOU FOR THE
DELAY IN GETTING STARTED.
I KNOW THAT YOU ARE AWARE THAT WE HAVE BEEN IN
SESSION WITH THE LAWYERS. WE'VE HAD SOME OTHER PROBLEMS
GETTING STARTED THIS MORNING, OTHER MATTERS THAT I HAVE HAD
TO TAKE UP OUT OF YOUR PRESENCE.
I HAVE HAD TO VIEW SOME VIDEOTAPES THAT ARE
GOING TO BE SHOWN THIS MORNING BEFORE THEY ARE SHOWN TO YOU
TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE ACCEPTABLE, AND I APOLOGIZE TO
YOU AGAIN FOR THE DELAY.
DEPUTY MAGNERA HAS ALREADY PUT A CALL IN FOR
THE OTHER PROBLEM THAT WE HAD BACK THERE, SO HOPEFULLY WE
WON'T HAVE THAT PROBLEM AGAIN, BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND
THIS IS A 25-YEAR OLD COURT BUILDING AND WE HAVE THOSE
PROBLEMS FROM TIME TO TIME.
ALL RIGHT. MR. DARDEN, DO YOU WISH TO RESUME
WITH YOUR DIRECT EXAMINATION OF DETECTIVE VANNATTER?
MS. CLARK: YES, YOUR HONOR. THANK YOU.
THE COURT: DETECTIVE, WOULD YOU RESUME THE WITNESS
STAND, PLEASE.
PHILIP VANNATTER,
THE WITNESS ON THE STAND AT THE TIME OF THE EVENING
ADJOURNMENT, RESUMED THE STAND AND TESTIFIED FURTHER AS
FOLLOWS:
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
THE RECORD SHOULD REFLECT THAT WE HAVE BEEN
REJOINED BY ALL THE MEMBERS NOW OF OUR JURY PANEL.
DETECTIVE PHILIP VANNATTER IS ON THE WITNESS
STAND ON DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. DARDEN.
GOOD MORNING, DETECTIVE VANNATTER.
THE WITNESS: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: DETECTIVE, YOU ARE REMINDED YOU ARE STILL
UNDER OATH.
MR. DARDEN, YOU MAY CONTINUE.
MR. DARDEN: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN.
THE JURY: GOOD MORNING.
DIRECT EXAMINATION (RESUMED)
BY MR. DARDEN:
Q DETECTIVE VANNATTER, WHEN WE LEFT OFF YESTERDAY
YOU TOLD US THAT YOU WERE SPEAKING TO KATO KAELIN WHEN YOU
WERE INTERRUPTED BY DETECTIVE FUHRMAN?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
Q WERE YOU TAKING MR. KAELIN'S STATEMENT AT THAT
TIME?
A I WAS AT THAT POINT WRITING NOTES TO TAKE THE
ENTIRE STATEMENT THAT I HAD TALKED TO HIM ABOUT, YES.
Q ALL RIGHT.
WERE YOU WRITING THOSE NOTES SIMULTANEOUS WITH
YOUR CONVERSATION WITH MR. KAELIN?
A NO, SIR, I WASN'T.
Q SO YOU HAD ALREADY SPOKEN TO MR. KAELIN?
A I HAD A CONVERSATION THAT I WAS GOING TO GO
BACK, GO OVER THE CONVERSATION AND WRITE NOTES OF THE
CONVERSATION.
Q WAS MR. KAELIN PRESENT OR RATHER IN YOUR
PRESENCE WHEN DETECTIVE FUHRMAN CAME TO GET YOU?
A YES, HE WAS.
Q NOW, WERE YOU THE FIRST DETECTIVE TO BE TAKEN
TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE HOUSE TO VIEW THE GLOVE?
A I DIDN'T KNOW AT THAT TIME, BUT I HAVE
SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND OUT THAT I WAS NOT.
Q NOW, AND WHAT TIME WAS IT THAT YOU SAW THE
GLOVE, IF YOU RECALL?
A IT WAS APPROXIMATELY 6:30. THAT IS
APPROXIMATION. SOMETIME BETWEEN 6:15, 6:30.
Q OKAY.
NOW, YESTERDAY YOU TOLD US THAT YOU CLIMBED A
WALL JUST LAST WEEK; IS THAT RIGHT?
A YES.
Q OKAY.
AND WAS THAT IN CONNECTION WITH A CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION?
A NO, SIR. IT WAS IN CONNECTION WITH DOING MY
LAWNS AND TAKING CARE OF MY HOME.
Q OKAY.
ALSO YESTERDAY YOU TOLD US THAT YOU AND
DETECTIVE FUHRMAN WENT TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE HOUSE AND
THAT YOU SAW THE GLOVE THERE ON THE GROUND; IS THAT RIGHT?
A YES.
Q OKAY.
HOW LONG DID YOU REMAIN ON THAT SOUTH WALKWAY?
A NOT VERY LONG. I WALKED BACK OUT FRONT WITH
FUHRMAN AND NOT VERY LONG, A MINUTE OR TWO.
Q OKAY.
SO YOU AND DETECTIVE FUHRMAN WALKED TO THE
FRONT OF THE HOUSE?
A BACK OUT TO THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE, THAT'S
CORRECT.
Q AND AT THAT TIME DID YOU AND DETECTIVE FUHRMAN
HAVE A CONVERSATION?
A YES.
Q DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO SOMETHING?
A I DID.
Q WHAT DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO?
A I ASKED HIM TO GO BACK TO THE BUNDY LOCATION TO
LOOK AT THE OTHER GLOVE AND TO MAKE SURE THAT I WAS SEEING
WHAT I WAS SEEING.
Q AND WHERE WAS DETECTIVE LANGE AT THAT TIME?
A I BELIEVE DETECTIVE LANGE HAD COME OUT OF THE
HOUSE. I BELIEVE HE HAD JUST LEFT ARNELLE SIMPSON, BUT I'M
NOT POSITIVE OF THAT.
Q OKAY.
NOW, WHY DID YOU TELL DETECTIVE FUHRMAN TO GO
BACK TO BUNDY AND VIEW THE GLOVE?
A BECAUSE WHAT I HAD SEEN ORIGINALLY AT BUNDY AND
WHAT I HAD SEEN AT ROCKINGHAM, IT APPEARED TO BE THE SAME
TYPE GLOVE, A LEFT AND A RIGHT-HANDED GLOVE, MAN'S LEATHER
GLOVE.
I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS ACTUALLY
WHAT I WAS SEEING. I WANTED HIM TO GO BACK AND CONFIRM
THAT THIS WAS A LEFT-HANDED MAN'S LEATHER GLOVE.
Q AND DID DETECTIVE FUHRMAN LEAVE YOUR PRESENCE?
A HE DID.
Q DID YOU WATCH HIM AS HE LEFT?
A YES.
Q DID YOU SEE WHERE HE WENT AT THAT TIME?
A I OBSERVED HIM AND DETECTIVE PHILLIPS EXIT THE
ROCKINGHAM GATE TO -- OR I'M SORRY -- EXIT THE ASHFORD GATE
TO GO TO THEIR VEHICLE THAT WAS PARKED THERE AND LEAVE THE
LOCATION.
Q WHAT TIME, IF YOU RECALL, DID PHILLIPS AND
FUHRMAN LEAVE THE LOCATION?
A I BELIEVE IT WAS APPROXIMATELY 6:40 IN THE
MORNING.
Q AND DID YOU REMAIN STANDING IN FRONT OF THE
PROPERTY AT ROCKINGHAM?
A NO. I MET WITH MY PARTNER, DETECTIVE LANGE, IN
THE FRONT THERE. WE HAD A BRIEF CONVERSATION.
Q WHEN YOU SAY THAT YOU MET WITH DETECTIVE LANGE
IN THE FRONT, DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU MET WITH HIM INSIDE THE
HOUSE OR OUTSIDE THE HOUSE?
A OUTSIDE THE HOUSE.
Q OKAY. WERE YOU STILL ON MR. SIMPSON'S
PROPERTY AT THAT TIME?
A YES, IN HIS DRIVEWAY.
Q AND WHAT DID YOU AND DETECTIVE LANGE DO AT THAT
TIME, IF ANYTHING?
A WELL, WE -- WE DISCUSSED WHAT -- WHAT HAD BEEN
FOUND, THE FACT THAT WE MAY HAVE AN EXTENSION OF THE CRIME
SCENE FROM BUNDY, AND WE MADE A DETERMINATION THAT
DETECTIVE LANGE WOULD RETURN TO THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE
IMMEDIATELY AND START THAT INVESTIGATION.
Q OKAY.
AND DID DETECTIVE LANGE LEAVE YOUR PRESENCE AT
THAT TIME?
A YES.
Q OKAY. DID YOU WATCH HIM LEAVE?
A YES.
Q WHAT TIME WAS IT WHEN DETECTIVE LANGE LEFT
ROCKINGHAM THAT MORNING?
A APPROXIMATELY 6:45.
Q NOW, YOU SAY THAT YOU AND DETECTIVE LANGE
DISCUSSED THE IDEA THAT YOU NOW HAD AN EXTENSION OF THE
BUNDY CRIME SCENE?
A WELL, WE BELIEVED AT THAT POINT THAT THE
PROBABILITY OF WHAT HAD BEEN FOUND, THAT WE HAD AN
EXTENSION FROM THE BUNDY CRIME SCENE.
Q OKAY. NOW, DID YOU WALK DETECTIVE LANGE TO HIS
CAR?
A NO.
Q OKAY. WHAT, IF ANYTHING, DID YOU DO AFTER
DETECTIVE LANGE LEFT?
A I WAS IN THE DRIVEWAY OF THE RESIDENCE AND I
STARTED LOOKING AROUND, AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE -- OF
ONE OF THE VEHICLES PARKED IN THE ROCKINGHAM DRIVEWAY I
OBSERVED WHAT -- WHAT APPEARED TO ME TO BE A BLOOD SPOT ON
THE GROUND.
Q YOU SAW A BLOOD SPOT?
A WHAT APPEARED TO BE A BLOOD SPOT, YES.
Q DID YOU SAY THAT YOU SAW THAT BLOOD SPOT IN THE
VICINITY OF A PARKED VEHICLE?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q CAN YOU DESCRIBE THIS VEHICLE FOR US?
A IT WAS NEAR THE TWO VEHICLES THAT WERE PARKED
IN THE DRIVEWAY AND I BELIEVE IT WAS CLOSEST TO THE BENTLEY
THAT WAS PARKED THERE.
Q NOW, WAS THAT THE FIRST TIME THAT YOU NOTICED
THIS BLOOD DROP OR APPARENT BLOOD DROP?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
Q AND WHAT SIGNIFICANCE, IF ANY, DID YOU ATTACH
TO YOUR OBSERVATION OF THAT APPARENT BLOOD DROP?
A WELL, SEEING THAT BLOOD DROP OBVIOUSLY
TRIGGERED THE FACT THAT I HAD SEEN WHAT APPEARED TO BE A
BLOOD TRAIL LEAVING THE CRIME SCENE AT BUNDY WITH SOMEONE
THAT WAS EITHER INJURED OR CARRYING SOMETHING BLOODY THAT
WAS DRIPPING, IMMEDIATELY MADE ME THINK THAT I PICKED UP
THE BLOOD TRAIL AGAIN FROM BUNDY.
Q WHAT DID YOU DO AT THAT POINT? WHAT, IF
ANYTHING, DETECTIVE?
A I WALKED WEST IN THE DRIVEWAY CONCENTRATING ON
LOOKING AT THE DRIVEWAY TO SEE IF I COULD FIND ANY OTHER
BLOOD DROPS OR WHAT APPEARED TO BE BLOOD DROPS, AND I DID.
I FOUND APPROXIMATELY THREE OR FOUR MORE DROPS
BETWEEN THE REAR END OF THE BRONCO AND THE FIRST ONE THAT
I DISCOVERED.
Q AND AT THAT TIME DID YOU APPROACH THE BRONCO
AGAIN?
A I DID, YES.
Q WHAT DID YOU DO AT THAT TIME?
A WELL, SEEING THE -- WHAT APPEARED TO BE ANOTHER
BLOOD TRAIL, I WALKED TO THE BRONCO TO HAVE A CLOSER LOOK
AT THE BRONCO TO SEE IF THERE WAS ANY OTHER BLOOD I COULD
SEE THERE.
I LOOKED IN FROM THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE
VEHICLE AND I OBSERVED WHAT APPEARED TO BE A BLOOD SMEAR
ALONG THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CONSOLE AND WHAT APPEARED
TO BE BLOOD ON THE INSIDE OF THE DRIVER'S DOOR OF THE
VEHICLE.
Q WHAT HAPPENED NEXT, DETECTIVE?
A I THEN WALKED BACK EAST IN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN
LOOKING AT THE -- WHAT APPEARED TO BE BLOOD DROPS, AND
FOLLOWED THEM TO THE -- FOUND AN ADDITIONAL THREE OR FOUR
DROPS THAT LED TO THE FRONT DOOR OF THE LOCATION.
Q YOU TOLD US THAT AT SOME POINT A CRIMINALIST
APPEARED AT THE ROCKINGHAM HOUSE?
A YES, SIR.
Q THAT WAS DENNIS FUNG?
A YES.
Q AND WHAT TIME DID HE ARRIVE?
A APPROXIMATELY 7:10 IN THE MORNING.
Q OKAY.
AND DID A CRIME SCENE PHOTOGRAPHER APPEAR AT
ROCKINGHAM?
A YES.
Q AT WHAT POINT DURING THE DAY WAS THAT?
A I BELIEVE HE ACCOMPANIED DETECTIVE FUHRMAN BACK
TO THE LOCATION, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN SHORTLY AFTER THE
CRIMINALIST ARRIVED.
Q OKAY.
WERE THOSE APPARENT BLOOD DROPS PHOTOGRAPHED?
A YES.
Q AND WAS THE BRONCO SEIZED?
A YES.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: YOUR HONOR, WE HAVE A BOARD HERE. IT IS
ENTITLED "BLOOD TRAIL AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM AVENUE."
MAY IT BE MARKED PEOPLE'S 118?
THE CLERK: 120.
MR. DARDEN: 120?
THE CLERK: YES.
MR. DARDEN: PEOPLE'S 120.
(PEO'S 120 FOR ID = POSTERBOARD W/PHOTOS)
MR. DARDEN: IT CONTAINS SEVERAL PHOTOGRAPHS, YOUR
HONOR. THEY ARE LETTERED A THROUGH G.
THE COURT: LOOKS LIKE A THROUGH K TO ME.
MR. DARDEN: TO ME, TOO.
THE COURT: IT IS AMAZING HOW I CAN SEE THROUGH THE
BOARD.
MR. DARDEN: THAT IS WHY YOU ARE THE JUDGE AND I'M
THE LAWYER.
Q DETECTIVE, IF YOU WILL STEP DOWN FROM THE
WITNESS STAND FOR A MOMENT, PLEASE.
A YES, SIR.
(WITNESS COMPLIES.)
Q DETECTIVE, IF YOU WILL WALK OVER TO THIS SIDE
OF THE BOARD, PLEASE, AND DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO
PHOTOGRAPH A ON THE BOARD THAT HAS BEEN MARKED PEOPLE'S
120.
A YES, SIR.
WHERE DO I GO? I HAVE NO PLACE TO GO.
Q KEEP YOUR VOICE UP, DETECTIVE.
A YES, SIR. I'M SORRY.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DETECTIVE, SHOWING YOU WHAT IS
MARKED PEOPLE'S 120, PHOTOGRAPH A. DO YOU SEE THAT
PHOTOGRAPH?
A YES, SIR. YES, I DO.
Q WHAT IS DEPICTED IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH?
A THIS IS THE ROCKINGHAM GATE, THE ENTRANCE TO
THE RESIDENCE. THIS IS THE REAR OF THE BRONCO. THIS SHOWS
THE RESIDENCE ADDRESS AND THESE TWO SMALL WHITE CARDS YOU
SEE ARE EVIDENCE TAGS TO MARK APPARENT BLOOD DROPS.
Q OKAY. WHAT IS SHOWN IN PHOTOGRAPH B?
A PHOTOGRAPH B IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE FIRST BLOOD
DROP THAT IS IN THE ASPHALT STREET THERE.
Q OKAY.
AND PHOTOGRAPH C, THAT IS A PERSPECTIVE SHOT OF
THE -- OF A PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM?
A YES, SIR, IT IS. IT IS LOOKING EAST TOWARD THE
GARAGE.
Q OKAY. DO YOU SEE THE WHITE MARKERS THERE IN
THE DRIVEWAY?
A YES, SIR.
Q OKAY. WHAT ARE THOSE MEANT TO DEPICT OR
INDICATE?
A THOSE ARE EVIDENCE TAGS THAT ARE PUT THERE BY
THE CRIMINALIST WHEN HE IS MARKING AND PHOTOGRAPHING
EVIDENCE.
Q OKAY.
AND WHAT IS THE CRIMINALIST INTENDING OR
ATTEMPTING TO MARK?
A TO SHOW THE TRAIL WHICH WOULD BE LEADING EAST
TOWARD THE RESIDENCE.
Q AND PHOTOGRAPH D?
A PHOTOGRAPH D IS THE -- SHOWS THE FIRST DROP
THAT I OBSERVED IN THE DRIVEWAY.
Q AND IS THAT THE -- THAT IS THE DROP YOU
REFERRED TO EARLIER WHEN YOU SAID YOU SAW AN APPARENT BLOOD
DROP IN THE VICINITY OF A VEHICLE?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES, SIR.
Q OKAY. WHICH VEHICLE IS THAT DEPICTED IN THE
PHOTOGRAPH, IF YOU CAN TELL?
A I BELIEVE THAT IS THE REAR VEHICLE. I BELIEVE
THAT IS THE SAAB, AS I RECALL.
Q AND PHOTOGRAPH E?
A PHOTOGRAPH E IS A CLOSE-UP OF THAT, I BELIEVE.
Q THAT BEING WHAT?
A THIS DROP THAT IS DEPICTED HERE IN PHOTOGRAPH
D, (INDICATING).
Q OKAY.
LET ME ASK YOU TO STEP TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
BOARD, IF YOU WILL.
A YES, SIR.
(WITNESS COMPLIES.)
Q PHOTOGRAPH F, WHAT IS DEPICTED IN PHOTOGRAPH F?
A THAT AGAIN IS A CONTINUATION OF THE BLOOD DROPS
THAT RUN TOWARD OR WHAT APPEARED TO BE BLOOD DROPS THAT RUN
TOWARD THE FRONT OF THE RESIDENCE.
THESE TAGS AGAIN ARE PLACED BY THE CRIMINALIST
TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF THOSE DROPS.
Q AFTER YOU RETURNED FROM THE BRONCO, DID YOU
FOLLOW -- YOU FOLLOWED THE APPARENT BLOOD DROPS?
A I DID, YES, SIR.
Q AND WHERE DID THEY LEAD YOU?
A WELL, THEY -- THEY -- THEY ULTIMATE -- I
ULTIMATELY DETERMINED THAT THEY LED ME RIGHT INTO THE
RESIDENCE.
Q RIGHT THROUGH THE FRONT DOOR?
A RIGHT THROUGH THE FRONT DOOR, THAT'S CORRECT.
Q WHAT IS SHOWN IN PHOTOGRAPH G?
A PHOTOGRAPH G I ALSO BELIEVE IS A CLOSE-UP OF
THE FIRST EVIDENCE TAG THAT IS DEPICTED IN PHOTOGRAPH A --
F HERE, (INDICATING).
Q AND PHOTOGRAPH H?
A PHOTOGRAPH H WOULD BE A CLOSE-UP, I BELIEVE,
OF THE DROP THAT IS DEPICTED IN PHOTOGRAPH F AND PHOTOGRAPH
I TOWARD THE FRONT OF THE RESIDENCE.
Q OKAY. PHOTOGRAPH I?
A IS A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, A CLOSER
PERSPECTIVE OF THE EVIDENCE TAG THAT IS DEPICTED IN
PHOTOGRAPH F HERE, (INDICATING).
Q AND WHAT IS DEPICTED IN PHOTOGRAPH J?
A PHOTOGRAPH J IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE DROPLET THAT
YOU SEE FROM A DISTANCE IN PHOTOGRAPH K. IT IS FIRST SHOWN
IN A PERSPECTIVE TO THE FRONT DOOR AND THEN THE
PHOTOGRAPHER TAKES A CLOSE-UP OF IT TO IDENTIFY IT.
Q AND PHOTOGRAPH K?
A THAT IS A PERSPECTIVE OF THE SAME DROP IN J
FROM A DISTANCE THAT SHOWS THE FRONT DOOR, THE PERSPECTIVE
TO THE FRONT DOOR.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: NOW, DETECTIVE, THERE IS ALSO
A DIAGRAM CONTAINED ON THIS BOARD; IS THAT CORRECT?
A YES, SIR.
Q OKAY.
DO YOU SEE THE RED LINES AND THE RED DROPS
DEPICTED ON THE DIAGRAM?
A YES.
Q WHAT ARE THEY INTENDED TO INDICATE, DETECTIVE?
A THAT WOULD INDICATE THE START OF THE TRAIL AT
THE BACK OF THE BRONCO WHICH WAS PARKED ON THE STREET,
LEADS INTO THE DRIVEWAY AND RIGHT TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE
HOME.
MR. DARDEN: YOUR HONOR, IF WE MAY, MAY WE SHOW THE
JURY THE BOARD?
THE COURT: YES.
MR. DARDEN: THE ENTIRE JURY THE BOARD.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: NOW, DETECTIVE YESTERDAY YOU
TOLD US THAT THE BLOOD TRAIL AT BUNDY ENDED AT THE APRON
BEHIND 875 SOUTH BUNDY; IS THAT CORRECT?
A YES.
Q OKAY.
IF YOU RECALL, WHAT IS THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE
-- THE BLOOD DROP CLOSEST TO THE REAR OF THE BRONCO LOCATED
AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM?
A THE DISTANCE FROM THE REAR OF THE BRONCO TO THE
BLOOD DROP?
Q YEAH, YEAH.
A I CAN'T TELL YOU EXACTLY. I WOULD HAVE TO
ESTIMATE THAT.
Q WELL, GO AHEAD. ESTIMATE.
A OH, PROBABLY THREE, FOUR FEET MAYBE.
Q OKAY.
SO YOU PICK UP THE TRAIL AT THE REAR OF THE
BRONCO AT ROCKINGHAM?
A YES.
Q OKAY.
NOW, YOU TOLD US A MOMENT AGO THAT THE BLOOD
TRAIL -- THAT YOU FOLLOWED THE BLOOD TRAIL INTO THE FRONT
DOOR?
A I FOLLOWED IT TO THE FRONT DOOR. AT THAT POINT
OTHER DETECTIVES WERE THERE AND POINTED OUT BLOOD SPOTS
RIGHT IN THE FOYER OF THE HOME TO ME.
Q OTHER DETECTIVES POINTED OUT BLOOD DROPS INSIDE
MR. SIMPSON'S HOME?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: MAY I HAVE ONE MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
AND DEFENSE COUNSEL.)
MR. DARDEN: PEOPLE'S 112, YOUR HONOR.
Q DETECTIVE, SHOWING YOU A PHOTOGRAPH PREVIOUSLY
MARKED AS PEOPLE'S 112, WHAT IS DEPICTED IN THAT
PHOTOGRAPH?
A THAT PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE FOYER AREA OF MR.
SIMPSON'S HOME AND IT SHOWS A CRIMINALIST EVIDENCE TAG OF
AN AREA THAT CONTAINED WHAT APPEARED TO BE BLOOD DROPS.
MR. DARDEN: OKAY.
YOUR HONOR, WE HAVE A SECOND PHOTOGRAPH. IT HAS
NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY MARKED. MAY IT BE MARKED PEOPLE'S 121?
THE COURT: YES.
(PEO'S 121 FOR ID = PHOTOGRAPH)
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: AND SHOWING YOU WHAT HAS BEEN
MARKED AS PEOPLE'S 121, DETECTIVE, WHAT IS DEPICTED IN THAT
PHOTOGRAPH?
A THAT IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE APPARENT BLOOD DROPS
THAT WAS SHOWN IN THE OTHER PHOTOGRAPH ON A CLOSER
PERSPECTIVE.
Q AND THESE BLOOD DROPS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE
FOYER OF MR. SIMPSON'S HOME?
A INSIDE THE FRONT DOOR, YES, SIR.
Q DID YOU CONTINUE TO SEARCH THAT AREA FOR OTHER
BLOOD DROPS?
A NOT AT THAT POINT, NO.
Q WHAT DID YOU DO AT THAT POINT?
A I HAD OTHER DETECTIVES THAT HAD ARRIVED AND I
HAD A UNIFORMED OR A COUPLE OF UNIFORMED OFFICERS THERE.
I INFORMED THEM THAT IT WAS NOW A CRIME SCENE, TO SEAL IT,
NOT TO DO ANYTHING UNTIL I RETURNED, THAT I WAS GOING TO DO
A SEARCH WARRANT TO GET INTO THE RESIDENCE.
Q WEREN'T YOU ALREADY INSIDE THE RESIDENCE?
A YES, BUT I HADN'T SEARCHED IT.
Q NOW, WHEN YOU SAY THAT YOU TOLD THE OTHER
DETECTIVES TO SEAL THE LOCATION, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
A NOT LET ANYONE IN OR -- INTO THE LOCATION TO
CONTAMINATE ANY POSSIBLE EVIDENCE THAT MAY BE THERE.
Q WHAT DID YOU DO NEXT?
A I HAD -- I HAD OBSERVED THAT ARNELLE SIMPSON
HAD RETURNED TO THE LOCATION WITH A MAN THAT WAS
SUBSEQUENTLY IDENTIFIED AS AL COWLINGS WITH THE TWO MINOR
CHILDREN.
I SPOKE WITH MR. COWLINGS AND ASKED HIM IF
THERE WAS A PLACE THAT THEY COULD GO TO LEAVE THE RESIDENCE
BECAUSE IT WAS GOING TO BE SEALED AS A CRIME SCENE AND HE
STATED "YES" AND THEY LEFT.
Q WHAT HAPPENED NEXT, DETECTIVE?
A I LEFT THE LOCATION AT APPROXIMATELY 7:30.
Q WAS THE CRIMINALIST ALREADY THERE?
A OH, YES.
Q OKAY. WHAT WAS HE DOING AT 7:30, IF YOU KNOW?
A WELL, AT -- WHEN HE ARRIVED I HAD SHOWN HIM THE
EVIDENCE THAT HAD BEEN DISCOVERED. I TOLD HIM THAT I
WANTED IT TAGGED, PHOTOGRAPHED AND TO BE COLLECTED BECAUSE
IT WAS IN THE ELEMENTS AND THERE WAS A DOG RUNNING LOOSE ON
THE PROPERTY, AND HE WAS WORKING AT THAT WHEN I LEFT.
Q OKAY.
NOW, WHERE WAS DETECTIVE FUHRMAN WHEN YOU LEFT
THE PROPERTY AT 7:30 IN THE MORNING?
A THE LAST TIME I SAW DETECTIVE FUHRMAN HE WAS
WITH DETECTIVE ROBERTS BY THE FRONT DOOR OF THE RESIDENCE.
Q TO GO BACK FOR A MOMENT TO YOUR CONVERSATION
WITH MR. KAELIN, AT ANY TIME DID YOU ASK MR. KAELIN IF
THERE WAS AN EXTRA SET OF KEYS TO THE BRONCO?
A YES.
Q DID HE RESPOND?
A YES.
Q WHAT DID HE SAY?
A HE CONDUCTED A SEARCH OF THE KITCHEN AREA WHERE
EXTRA KEYS TO THE VEHICLE WERE NORMALLY KEPT. NONE WERE
FOUND.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: YOUR HONOR, WE HAVE ANOTHER BOARD. IT
IS ENTITLED "BRONCO EVIDENCE."
MAY IT BE MARKED PEOPLE'S 122?
THE COURT: PEOPLE'S 122.
(PEO'S 122 FOR ID = POSTERBOARD W/PHOTOS)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DETECTIVE, BEFORE YOU STEP
DOWN, YOU TOLD US YESTERDAY -- I'M SORRY -- YOU TOLD US
THIS MORNING THAT YOU HAD ASKED DETECTIVE FUHRMAN TO RETURN
TO BUNDY TO LOOK AT THE GLOVE AT BUNDY?
A YES.
Q HAD HE RETURNED FROM BUNDY BY THE TIME YOU LEFT
AT 7:30?
A YES.
Q WHEN IN PROXIMITY IN TIME TO YOUR DEPARTURE
FROM ROCKINGHAM DID DETECTIVE FUHRMAN RETURN?
A (NO AUDIBLE RESPONSE.)
Q IF YOU KNOW?
A HE ARRIVED, I BELIEVE, ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS
THE CRIMINALIST OR SHORTLY AFTER THE CRIMINALIST, WHICH
WOULD HAVE BEEN 7:10 TO 7:15.
Q DETECTIVE, IF YOU WILL STEP DOWN FOR A MOMENT,
PLEASE.
A YES, SIR.
MR. SHAPIRO: YOUR HONOR, I WOULD OBJECT TO HIM
STEPPING DOWN. THE OBJECTION WOULD BE IT WOULD BE LEADING
AND SUGGESTIVE UNTIL HE TESTIFIES.
THE COURT: OVERRULED.
THE WITNESS: (WITNESS COMPLIES.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DETECTIVE, SHOWING YOU THE
BOARD MARKED PEOPLE'S 122 AND ENTITLED "BRONCO EVIDENCE,"
FIRST, IN THE UPPER RIGHT-HAND CORNER, DOES THAT PHOTOGRAPH
DEPICT THE BRONCO YOU SAW PARKED AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM?
A IT WOULD APPEAR TO, YES.
Q AND SHOWING YOU THE PHOTOGRAPH MARKED A ON
PEOPLE'S 122, WHAT IS SHOWN IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH?
A THAT IS THE INSIDE OF THE DRIVER'S DOOR OF THE
VEHICLE.
Q AND THE WHITE TAGS? DO YOU SEE WHITE TAGS IN
PHOTOGRAPH A?
A YES, I DO.
Q AND WHAT ARE THOSE TAGS INTENDED TO INDICATE?
A THOSE ARE CRIMINALIST'S EVIDENCE TAGS THAT ARE
PLACED THERE WHERE EVIDENCE IS LOCATED ON THE INSIDE OF THE
VEHICLE. THAT IS TO PHOTOGRAPH AND DOCUMENT THE LOCATION
OF THE ITEMS.
Q OKAY. WHAT ITEMS ARE BEING MARKED IN THIS
PHOTOGRAPH?
A THERE IS BLOOD, WHAT APPEARS TO BE BLOOD AT
THESE AREAS INSIDE THE DOOR OF THE CAR.
Q DID YOU SEE THAT BLOOD IN THE BRONCO?
A I SAW -- I SAW BLOOD INSIDE THE BRONCO ON THE
DRIVER'S DOOR HERE ALONG THE TOP, (INDICATING), AND ALONG
THIS AREA HERE, (INDICATING).
Q YOU ARE INDICATING --
A 21 AND 22.
Q OKAY. YOU ALSO SEE AN EVIDENCE TAG
NO. 23 IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH; IS THAT RIGHT?
A YES, SIR.
Q DID YOU SEE BLOOD AT THAT LOCATION?
A I -- I -- I DON'T RECALL SEEING IT THERE.
THERE WAS -- NO, NOT AT THAT TIME. I DON'T RECALL SEEING
IT THERE.
Q OKAY.
AND DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO PHOTOGRAPH B.
A YES, SIR.
Q WHAT IS SHOWN IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH?
A THAT IS THE CONSOLE AREA PASSENGER SIDE OF THE
VEHICLE.
Q AND THERE ARE TWO EVIDENCE TAGS, (INDICATING),
IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH AS WELL; IS THAT CORRECT?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
Q TAG NUMBERS 31 AND 30?
A YES.
Q WHAT ARE THEY INTENDED TO INDICATE?
A AGAIN, THEY ARE CRIMINALIST EVIDENCE TAGS TO
INDICATE THE LOCATION OF EVIDENCE AND TO DOCUMENT ITS
LOCATION WHEN IT IS PHOTOGRAPHED.
Q NOW, DETECTIVE, YOU TOLD US A MOMENT AGO THAT
YOU LOOKED THROUGH THE PASSENGER WINDOW INSIDE THE VEHICLE;
IS THAT RIGHT?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU EVER LOOK INSIDE THE VEHICLE FROM ANY
OTHER PERSPECTIVE?
A I -- I DID A NUMBER OF TIMES THAT MORNING, YES,
BUT EARLIER IN THE MORNING.
Q AND YOU ALSO TESTIFIED THAT YOU ASKED MR.
KAELIN IF THERE WAS AN EXTRA SET OF KEYS TO THE BRONCO?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q WHY DID YOU ASK HIM FOR AN EXTRA SET OF KEYS?
A THE VEHICLE WAS LOCKED. WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY WAY
TO GET INTO THE VEHICLE.
Q ALL RIGHT. DID YOU TOUCH THE DOOR HANDLE?
A NO, I DID NOT.
Q HOW DO YOU KNOW THE VEHICLE WAS LOCKED?
A YOU COULD TELL BY LOOKING AT THE KNOBS, THE
LOCK KNOBS, THAT THE VEHICLE WAS LOCKED, AND I DIDN'T WANT
TO TOUCH IT BECAUSE IT WAS BEING PRESERVED AS EVIDENCE.
I ASKED FOR THE KEYS BECAUSE I KNEW THE VEHICLE
WAS GOING TO BE IMPOUNDED AND IT WOULD HAVE MADE IT EASIER
FOR THE TOW TRUCK DRIVER TO HAVE IMPOUNDED IT IF WE WOULD
HAVE HAD THE KEYS.
Q NOW, REFERRING YOUR ATTENTION AGAIN TO
PHOTOGRAPH A, DO YOU SEE ANY PORTION OF THE DOOR LOCK IN
THAT PHOTOGRAPH?
A YES. YOU CAN SEE IT RIGHT HERE, (INDICATING).
Q DID YOU EVER SEE ANYONE OPEN THE DOOR TO THE
BRONCO THAT MORNING?
A NO.
Q DID YOU EVER SEE DETECTIVE FUHRMAN OPEN THE
DOOR?
A NO.
Q DID YOU EVER OPEN THE DOOR?
A NO.
Q DID YOU EVER SEE ANYONE WIPE A BLOODY GLOVE
AROUND INSIDE THAT VEHICLE?
A NO.
Q NOW, THE PHOTOGRAPHS CONTAINED ON PEOPLE'S 122,
WERE THEY TAKEN AT ROCKINGHAM?
A YES. I -- I -- NO, NO. LET ME CORRECT THAT.
THEY WERE TAKEN THE FOLLOWING MORNING AT THE LOS ANGELES
POLICE DEPARTMENT PRINT SHACK WHERE WE HAD THE VEHICLE
TOWED TO.
Q NOW, YOU TOLD US A MOMENT AGO THAT YOU COULD
NOT SEE THE EVIDENCE MARKED WITH THE NO. 23; IS THAT RIGHT?
A I -- I DON'T RECALL SEEING IT DOWN THERE. I --
I COULD HAVE, BUT I DON'T RECALL AT THIS POINT.
Q OKAY. YOU DIDN'T OPEN THE DOOR TO LOOK?
A NO.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: COULD YOU SEE EACH AND EVERY
AREA, EACH SQUARE INCH OF THE INTERIOR OF THE BRONCO?
A NO, I COULD NOT.
Q YOU ALWAYS REMAINED OUTSIDE?
A YES.
Q ARE THE WINDOWS TINTED AT ALL?
A TO THE BEST OF MY RECOLLECTION I DON'T BELIEVE
THEY ARE, BUT I'M NOT REALLY POSITIVE ON THAT.
Q THANK YOU, DETECTIVE. YOU CAN RETAKE THE
STAND?
A (WITNESS COMPLIES.)
MR. DARDEN: YOUR HONOR, MAY WE SHOW THE BOARD TO THE
REST OF THE JURY?
THE COURT: YES.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: NOW, THE WHITE -- THE WHITE
MARKERS WITH THE NUMBERS THAT WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT,
THOSE ARE EVIDENCE MARKERS?
A YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
Q OKAY. WERE THOSE ITEMS COLLECTED?
A YES.
Q COLLECTED BY THE CRIMINALIST?
A YES.
Q AND I'M REFERRING SPECIFICALLY TO PEOPLE'S 122,
THE BRONCO BOARD.
A YES.
Q NOW, YOU EARLIER TOLD US THAT MR. SIMPSON WAS
NOT A SUSPECT. THAT IS WHILE YOU WERE AT BUNDY; IS THAT
CORRECT?
A AT WHAT POINT ARE YOU ASKING ME, SIR?
Q OKAY.
WELL, AFTER YOUR FIRST WALK THROUGH AT BUNDY
WAS HE A SUSPECT?
A NO.
Q AND WHEN YOU FIRST ARRIVED AT ROCKINGHAM WAS HE
A SUSPECT?
A NO.
Q DURING THE TIME THAT YOU WERE RINGING THE
BUZZER AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, WAS HE A SUSPECT THEN?
A NO.
Q AND WHEN YOU RANG THE FRONT DOOR AT ROCKINGHAM,
WAS HE A SUSPECT THEN?
A NO.
Q AT SOME POINT IN TIME DID YOU CONSIDER HIM A
SUSPECT?
A ABSOLUTELY, YES.
Q AND AT WHAT POINT IN TIME WAS -- WAS IT THAT
YOU CONSIDERED HIM A SUSPECT?
A HE BECOME A SUSPECT AS SOON AS I SAW THE GLOVE
AT THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE. IT APPEARED TO BE A MATCH TO THE
GLOVE -- THE OPPOSITE GLOVE TO THE GLOVE THAT I HAD SEEN
EARLIER AT BUNDY.
AND THEN AFTER COMING OUT INTO THE DRIVEWAY AND
FINDING THE BLOOD TRAIL, HE BECAME A VERY STRONG SUSPECT.
Q AND HOW, IF AT ALL, DID YOUR OBSERVATIONS OF
THE BLOOD INSIDE THE BRONCO FIGURE INTO YOUR DECISION THAT
MR. SIMPSON WAS A SUSPECT?
A THAT APPEARED TO BE THE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION
-- THE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION THAT HAD TRANSPORTED THE
BLOOD TRAIL FROM BUNDY TO ROCKINGHAM.
Q NOW, DID YOU TESTIFY EARLIER THAT YOU DECLARED
ROCKINGHAM A CRIME SCENE?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q NOW, AT THAT POINT, WHAT WERE YOUR
INVESTIGATIVE CONCERNS?
A AT WHAT POINT, SIR?
Q AT THE POINT IN TIME THAT YOU DECLARED
ROCKINGHAM A CRIME SCENE.
A AT THAT POINT MY INVESTIGATIVE CONCERNS WAS TO
ENSURE THAT THE LOCATION WAS SECURED, THAT THERE WAS NO
DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE AND TO FURTHER THE INVESTIGATION BY
GETTING A SEARCH WARRANT FOR THE INTERIOR OF THE RESIDENCE.
Q OKAY.
AND DID YOU OBTAIN A SEARCH WARRANT?
A I DID.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU CONSIDER THE BRONCO EVIDENCE AT ALL?
A OH, ABSOLUTELY, YES.
Q OKAY. NOW, WHAT STEPS DID YOU TAKE TO PRESERVE
THE BRONCO?
A I HAD A UNIFORMED OFFICER STATIONED ON THE
VEHICLE WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO PROTECT IT, NOT TO LET ANYONE
APPROACH OR DO ANYTHING WITH THE VEHICLE.
Q OKAY.
WELL, YOU HAVE SEEN SOME OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS
SHOWN BY THE DEFENSE IN THIS CASE?
A I HAVE.
Q DID YOU SEE THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE WOMAN PEERING
THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE BRONCO?
A YES.
Q HOW DID THAT HAPPEN, IF YOU KNOW?
A WELL, I DON'T -- I WASN'T THERE AT THAT TIME,
SO I CAN'T TELL YOU HOW, BUT IT UPSETS ME THAT IT DID
HAPPEN.
Q AND IN TERMS OF OBTAINING A SEARCH WARRANT FOR
THE PROPERTY, WHAT, IF ANYTHING, DID YOU DO?
A I LEFT THE LOCATION OF ROCKINGHAM, DROVE TO THE
BUNDY LOCATION TO INFORM MY PARTNER VERY BRIEFLY OF WHAT I
HAD FOUND, AND THEN PROCEEDED TO WEST L.A. STATION WHERE I
SAT DOWN AND WORKED ON THE WARRANT.
Q NOW, DID YOU ACTUALLY LEAVE ROCKINGHAM AT 7:30
A.M. THAT MORNING?
A APPROXIMATELY 7:30, YES.
Q OKAY.
WHAT TIME DID YOU LEAVE BUNDY, THE SECOND TIME?
A PROBABLY 7:45.
Q OKAY.
SO YOU LEFT DETECTIVE LANGE'S PRESENCE AT 7:45?
A APPROXIMATELY 7:45, YES.
Q AND WHERE DID YOU GO AT THAT PARTICULAR POINT
IN TIME?
A TO WEST LOS ANGELES STATION.
Q WHAT TIME DID YOU ARRIVE THERE?
A CLOSE TO EIGHT O'CLOCK.
Q AND YOU RETURNED TO ROCKINGHAM AT SOME POINT?
A YES.
Q AND WHY DID YOU GO BACK TO ROCKINGHAM?
A I HAD A SEARCH WARRANT.
Q AND WHAT TIME DID YOU RETURN TO ROCKINGHAM?
A APPROXIMATELY NOON.
Q NOW, PRIOR TO RETURNING TO ROCKINGHAM WITH A
SEARCH WARRANT DID YOU STOP AGAIN AT THE BUNDY LOCATION?
A YES, I DID.
Q OKAY. WHY DID YOU STOP THERE?
A TO INFORM MY PARTNER THAT I HAD A SEARCH
WARRANT AND THAT I WAS GOING TO THE ROCKINGHAM LOCATION TO
HAVE THAT EXECUTED.
Q AND WHEN YOU RETURNED TO ROCKINGHAM AT
APPROXIMATELY NOON THAT DAY WERE OTHER DETECTIVES AT THE
LOCATION?
A YES.
Q WAS DETECTIVE FUHRMAN THERE?
A YES.
Q WHAT ARE THE NAMES OF THE OTHER DETECTIVES THAT
WERE AT ROCKINGHAM AT THAT TIME?
A DETECTIVE ROBERTS WAS THERE, DETECTIVE LUPER,
DETECTIVE LEFALL, AND I DON'T RECALL ANY OTHER DETECTIVES
AT THAT POINT.
Q WERE THERE SOME UNIFORMED OFFICERS AT THE
LOCATION AT THAT TIME?
A YES.
Q HOW MANY UNIFORMED OFFICERS WERE THERE AT THE
LOCATION AT THAT TIME?
A I ONLY SAW TWO OR POSSIBLY THREE. THERE WERE
TWO AT THE ROCKINGHAM GATE AND I BELIEVE THERE WAS ONE AT
THE ASHFORD GATE, BUT I'M NOT POSITIVE ON THAT.
Q ARE YOU ACQUAINTED WITH OFFICER THOMPSON?
A I NOW KNOW WHO HE IS, YES.
Q OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
DID YOU SEE HIM AT THE LOCATION, THAT IS, AT
ROCKINGHAM WHEN YOU RETURNED AT 12:00 NOON?
A I DID.
Q AND WAS A SEARCH CONDUCTED OF MR. SIMPSON'S
HOME AT THAT TIME?
A SHORTLY AFTER THAT, YES.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU CONDUCT THAT SEARCH PERSONALLY?
A I DID NOT.
Q WHO CONDUCTED THE SEARCH, IF YOU KNOW?
A THE SEARCH WAS -- I TURNED OVER THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SEARCH AND THE SEARCH WARRANT TO
DETECTIVE LUPER FROM ROBBERY/HOMICIDE DIVISION.
Q AND WHY DID YOU DO THAT, DETECTIVE?
A BECAUSE I HAD TO LEAVE THE LOCATION.
MR. DARDEN: MAY I HAVE ONE MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: JUST ONE MORE MOMENT IF I MAY, YOUR
HONOR.
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DETECTIVE, YOU TOLD US THAT
MR. SIMPSON BECAME A SUSPECT AFTER YOU FOUND -- OR RATHER
AFTER DETECTIVE FUHRMAN FOUND THE GLOVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF THE PROPERTY; IS THAT CORRECT?
A AFTER IT WAS SHOWN TO ME HE BECAME A SUSPECT TO
ME, YES.
Q OKAY. AND NOT BEFORE THAT?
A NO.
MR. DARDEN: MAY WE APPROACH OFF THE RECORD FOR A
MOMENT?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(A CONFERENCE WAS HELD AT THE
BENCH, NOT REPORTED.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THERE IS SOMETHING I NEED
TO LOOK AT OUT OF YOUR PRESENCE AND I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO
STEP BACK.
UNFORTUNATELY, THE PROBLEM THAT YOU BUZZED
ABOUT HASN'T BEEN FIXED YET BUT WE ARE GOING TO TAKE OUR
BREAK AT NOON, THOUGH.
SO IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, I'M SURE WE SHOULD
HAVE A HALL MONITOR FOR THE FACILITIES, BUT IT SHOULD ONLY
BE ABOUT THREE TO FIVE MINUTES.
SO IF YOU WILL JUST STEP BACK INTO THE JURY
ROOM, PLEASE.
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT, OUT OF THE
PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)
THE COURT: MISS FORD, ARE YOU FORGETTING SOMETHING?
MS. FORD: PARDON?
THE COURT: ARE YOU FORGETTING SOMETHING?
THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
BE SEATED.
MR. DARDEN, YOU HAD SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO
SHOW US?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THE JURY HAS LEFT THE
COURTROOM.
(AT 11:21.M. A VIDEOTAPE
WAS PLAYED.)
(AT 11:24 A.M. THE PLAYING
OF THE VIDEOTAPE CONCLUDED.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. DARDEN.
ANY OBJECTIONS FROM THE DEFENSE?
MR. SHAPIRO: YES, YOUR HONOR, WE WOULD OBJECT.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. WHAT IS THE BASIS OF THE
OBJECTION?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN DEFENSE COUNSEL.)
MR. SHAPIRO: YOUR HONOR, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT IT
ACCURATELY REFLECTS WHAT THE TESTIMONY HAS BEEN. THE
TESTIMONY HAS BEEN HE WASN'T ARRESTED UNTIL THE 17TH, HE
WASN'T CHARGED, AND PREVIOUS TESTIMONY FROM PREVIOUS
WITNESSES HAVE BEEN THAT HE WAS NOT UNDER ARREST.
AND THAT I DON'T BELIEVE THIS ACCURATELY --
THIS GIVES A FALSE IMPRESSION THAT HE WAS ARRESTED, AT
LEAST TEMPORARILY.
THE COURT: BUT WE HAVE A CONCEPT IN THE LAW OF
ARREST AND DETENTION, THE CONCEPT OF DETENTION SHORT OF
ARREST, DON'T WE?
MR. SHAPIRO: WELL, WE HAVE NO TESTIMONY TO THAT YET,
YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. PERHAPS.
MR. SHAPIRO: THERE IS NO FOUNDATION.
THE COURT: AT THIS POINT.
MR. DARDEN.
MR. DARDEN: WELL, DETECTIVE VANNATTER IS HERE TO
EXPLAIN THE VIDEO AND TO EXPLAIN TO US WHETHER OR NOT MR.
SIMPSON WAS PLACED UNDER ARREST OR DETAINED, AND HE IS ALSO
HERE TO EXPLAIN TO US HOW IT IS THAT MR. SIMPSON BECAME
UNHANDCUFFED.
CERTAINLY HE IS COMPETENT TO TESTIFY TO ALL OF
THESE THINGS. HE IS A POLICE OFFICER.
MR. SHAPIRO: WE WOULD -- I'M SORRY, ARE YOU DONE?
WE WOULD ALSO, YOUR HONOR, OBJECT TO ANY OF THE
AUDIO PORTIONS OF THAT TAPE WITH A REPORTER ASKING
QUESTIONS, WITH MR. WEITZMAN MAKING SOME STATEMENTS TO HIS
CLIENT, WHICH ARE PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS, AND ARE ALL
HEARSAY STATEMENTS.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. I THINK THE AUDIO IS
PREDOMINANTLY STILL CAMERAS CLICKING AND SOMEBODY'S
ELECTRICAL GENERATOR.
DO YOU NEED THE AUDIO ON THIS, MR. DARDEN?
MR. DARDEN: MAY I HAVE ONE HOME, YOUR HONOR?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: WE OVERHEAR NO CONVERSATIONS.
MR. SHAPIRO: IF THEY DON'T HEAR CONVERSATIONS, THEN
THERE WILL BE NO OBJECTION TO NOT HAVING THE AUDIO.
THE COURT: MR. DARDEN?
MR. DARDEN: I'M SAYING THAT I DON'T HEAR ANY
CONVERSATIONS OR I DIDN'T HEAR A CONVERSATION BETWEEN MR.
WEITZMAN AND MR. SIMPSON.
THE COURT: DO YOU WANT THE --
MR. DARDEN: YOU TELL ME. MAYBE I'M WRONG.
THE COURT: DO YOU WANT THE AUDIO?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: NOT AT THIS TIME, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
I'M GOING TO SUSTAIN THE OBJECTION TO THE TAPE
AT THIS TIME UNTIL THERE IS A FOUNDATION FOR WHAT IT
DEPICTS.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. SHAPIRO: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. LET'S HAVE THE JURORS.
(BRIEF PAUSE.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT, IN THE
PRESENCE OF THE JURY:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, LADIES AND
GENTLEMEN. BE SEATED.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. YOU MAY PROCEED, MR. DARDEN.
MR. DARDEN: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
Q DETECTIVE, WHEN YOU ARRIVED BACK AT ROCKINGHAM,
YOU SAY YOU ARRIVED AT TWELVE O'CLOCK NOON?
A APPROXIMATELY NOON, YES.
Q OKAY. AND WAS MR. SIMPSON THERE AT THE
PROPERTY AT THAT TIME?
A NO.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU SEE MR. SIMPSON AT ROCKINGHAM SOMETIME
THAT DAY?
A YES.
Q AND DO YOU RECALL WHAT TIME AT ALL?
A APPROXIMATELY TEN MINUTES OR SO AFTER I
ARRIVED.
Q OKAY. AND WAS HE CARRYING ANYTHING THAT YOU
SAW?
A WHEN I FIRST SAW HIM?
Q YES.
A NO, SIR.
Q DID YOU SEE ANY LAWYERS ON THE PROPERTY OR
ANYONE YOU KNEW TO BE A LAWYER ON THE PROPERTY AT THAT
TIME?
A I SAW A LAWYER BY THE ROCKINGHAM GATE, YES.
Q OKAY. DID YOU RECOGNIZE THAT LAWYER?
A I DID.
Q THIS LAWYER WAS A LAWYER YOU HAD SEEN IN THE
PAST?
A YES.
Q AND WHO WAS THAT LAWYER?
A HOWARD WEITZMAN.
Q WHEN YOU ARRIVED AT NOON DID YOU HAVE A
CONVERSATION WITH MR. WEITZMAN AT ALL?
A JUST TO GREET HIM, JUST HELLO TYPE
CONVERSATION.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU ALLOW MR. WEITZMAN TO WALK ONTO THE
PROPERTY AT THAT TIME, THAT IS, AT 12:00 NOON?
A NO.
Q AND WHY NOT?
A BECAUSE IT WAS A SEALED CRIME SCENE.
Q OKAY.
DID HE ASK PERMISSION TO WALK ONTO THE PROPERTY
AT THAT TIME?
A NO.
Q WHERE WAS MR. SIMPSON THE FIRST TIME YOU SAW
HIM THAT DAY?
A WALKING ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY IN THE FRONT OF THE
RESIDENCE.
Q AND COULD YOU SEE HIS HANDS AT THAT TIME?
A I COULD.
Q WHERE WERE THEY?
A HE WAS HANDCUFFED.
Q HAD YOU HANDCUFFED MR. SIMPSON?
A NO.
Q SOMEONE ELSE HAD HANDCUFFED HIM?
A APPARENTLY. I DIDN'T.
Q OKAY. HAD YOU ORDERED SOMEONE TO HANDCUFF HIM?
A NO.
Q HAD YOU ORDERED SOMEONE OR ANYONE TO ARREST
HIM?
A NO.
Q IF YOU KNOW, DETECTIVE, HOW IS IT THAT THIS
DEFENDANT WAS HANDCUFFED THAT DAY?
A WHEN I ARRIVED --
MR. SHAPIRO: I'M GOING TO OBJECT, YOUR HONOR,
SPECULATION.
THE COURT: SUSTAINED.
Q BY MR. DARDEN: OKAY.
YOU TOLD US A WHILE AGO THAT YOU WERE
ACQUAINTED WITH OFFICER THOMPSON?
A I AM NOW; I WASN'T THEN.
Q DID YOU SPEAK TO OFFICER THOMPSON WHEN YOU
ARRIVED AT NOON?
A YES.
Q OKAY. DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO SOMETHING?
A I DID.
Q WHAT DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO?
A TO MAKE SURE THAT MR. SIMPSON WASN'T ABLE TO
ENTER THE PROPERTY IF HE SHOWED UP THERE.
Q DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO ANYTHING ELSE?
A I ASKED HIM TO DETAIN HIM THERE IN FRONT AND
LET ME KNOW THAT HE WAS THERE.
Q YOU ASKED OFFICER THOMPSON TO DETAIN MR.
SIMPSON?
A YES AND LET ME KNOW THAT HE WAS PRESENT.
Q AND YOU HAVE BEEN A POLICE OFFICER HOW MANY
YEARS NOW, DETECTIVE?
A OVER 26.
Q OKAY.
THIS TERM THAT YOU JUST USED, "DETAINED," WHAT
DID THAT TERM MEAN TO YOU?
A IT JUST MEANS TO ASK A PERSON OR HAVE A PERSON
STAY AT A CERTAIN LOCATION. IT IS NOT PHYSICALLY PUTTING
HIM UNDER ARREST OR TAKING HIM INTO CUSTODY.
Q WELL, WHEN YOU TOLD OFFICER THOMPSON TO DETAIN
MR. SIMPSON IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, DID YOU INTEND TO
CONVEY TO HIM THAT HE SHOULD HANDCUFF MR. SIMPSON?
A NO, SIR.
Q OKAY.
DID YOU EVER USE THE TERM "HANDCUFF" OR THE
WORD "HANDCUFF" WHEN YOU POSED THIS QUESTION TO OFFICER
THOMPSON?
A NO.
Q WHEN YOU SAW MR. SIMPSON HANDCUFFED ON THE
PROPERTY, THAT FIRST TIME, WAS HE IN THE COMPANY OF
SOMEONE?
A OFFICER THOMPSON.
Q AND WHAT DID YOU DO WHEN YOU SAW THE DEFENDANT
HANDCUFFED WITH OFFICER THOMPSON?
A I WENT OUT TO HIS LOCATION.
Q AND DOES THAT MEAN YOU WENT TO MR. SIMPSON?
A YES. I EXITED THE RESIDENCE AND WALKED TO
WHERE MR. SIMPSON WAS.
Q OKAY.
NOW, WHERE WAS MR. WEITZMAN AT THAT TIME?
A HE WAS STILL AT THE ROCKINGHAM GATE.
Q OKAY.
AND WHAT, IF ANYTHING, OCCURRED WHEN YOU WALKED
OVER TO MR. SIMPSON?
A I EXPLAINED THE REASON I WAS THERE, WHAT WAS
HAPPENING, WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN, AND MR. SIMPSON'S
ATTORNEY CAME WALKING UP AND ASKED IF HE COULD JOIN THE
CONVERSATION AND I SAID YES.
Q OKAY.
DID MR. WEITZMAN ASK YOU TO DO ANYTHING?
A YES.
Q WHAT DID HE ASK YOU TO DO?
A HE ASKED ME TO TAKE THE HANDCUFFS OFF.
Q DID YOU HAVE THE KEY TO THE HANDCUFFS?
A I HAVE A HANDCUFF KEY, YES.
Q DID YOU TAKE THE CUFFS OFF?
A YES.
Q WHY DID YOU TAKE THE CUFFS OFF MR. SIMPSON?
A BECAUSE HE WAS NOT UNDER ARREST AT THAT TIME.
Q BUT YOU CONSIDERED HIM A SUSPECT; IS THAT
CORRECT?
A HE WAS A VERY STRONG SUSPECT.
Q YOU CONSIDERED HIM A SUSPECT IN TWO BRUTAL
MURDERS?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q WHY DIDN'T YOU ARREST HIM AT THAT TIME?
A WELL, KNOWING THE SITUATION THAT I WAS IN, THE
AMOUNT OF PRESS THAT WAS PRESENT, I FELT IT BETTER TO
CONTINUE THE INVESTIGATION AND OBTAIN ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE,
SUCH AS SEROLOGY EVIDENCE, BEFORE PRESENTING THE CASE TO
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR FILING.
I REALIZE I ONLY HAVE A 48-HOUR TIME FRAME TO
PUT TOGETHER AND FILE A CRIMINAL CASE IF A PERSON IS IN
CUSTODY.
Q WHY WAS THE MEDIA'S PRESENCE AT ALL A FACTOR IN
THE DECISION TO TAKE THE HANDCUFFS OFF?
A JUST THE OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF MEDIA THAT WAS
PRESENT. IT IS -- IT HAD TURNED INTO A MEDIA FEST, AND
WITH WHO I WAS DEALING WITH, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I
HAD A SUFFICIENT CASE BEFORE PRESENTING THAT CASE TO THE
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR FILING.
AGAIN, I REALIZE I ONLY HAVE 48 HOURS TO EITHER
FILE THE CASE OR TURN THE PERSON LOOSE AND I THOUGHT IT
WOULD TAKE ME LONGER THAN THAT, PROBABLY AN ADDITIONAL DAY
PAST THAT, TO GET ANY KIND OF SEROLOGY TESTING DONE. THAT
IS WHY I DIDN'T PLACE HIM UNDER ARREST AT THAT POINT.
MR. SHAPIRO: MOTION TO STRIKE, NONRESPONSIVE.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THE JURY IS TO DISREGARD THE
ANSWER AFTER "AGAIN I REALIZE I ONLY HAVE 48 HOURS," THAT
PART IS STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD AS BEING NONRESPONSIVE.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: IF I CAN GO BACK AND ASK THAT
SAME QUESTION, YOUR HONOR.
THE COURT: YOU ASKED HIM IF THE MEDIA HAD ANYTHING
TO DO WITH HIS DECISION NOT TO ARREST. HE TOLD US ABOUT IT
BEING A MEDIA FEST.
MR. DARDEN: YOU STRUCK THE ENTIRE ANSWER, DID YOU?
THE COURT: NO. I STRUCK AGAIN FROM "AGAIN I KNEW I
ONLY HAD 48 HOURS," THAT PART, SINCE THE JURY HAS HEARD IT
ONCE ALREADY.
MR. DARDEN: OKAY.
Q DETECTIVE VANNATTER, WHEN YOU RELEASED THE
HANDCUFFS FROM MR. -- MR. SIMPSON'S WRIST, DID YOU HAVE THE
SEROLOGY RESULTS, TEST RESULTS?
MR. SHAPIRO: OBJECTION, LEADING AND SUGGESTIVE.
THE COURT: OVERRULED.
THE WITNESS: NO.
Q BY MR. DARDEN: CAN YOU TELL US WHETHER OR NOT
YOU HAD SUFFICIENT TIME TO EVALUATE ALL OF THE EVIDENCE YOU
HAD UP TO THAT POINT?
A I HAD ENOUGH PROBABLE CAUSE TO MAKE AN ARREST,
ABSOLUTELY, BUT I WANTED TO CONTINUE THE INVESTIGATION TO
-- TO ENSURE THAT EVERYTHING I HAD WAS WHAT I BELIEVED I
HAD, AND TO ENSURE THAT I HAD A CASE FOR FILING WHEN IT WAS
PRESENTED.
MR. SHAPIRO: MOTION TO STRIKE AS NONRESPONSIVE.
THE COURT: OVERRULED.
Q BY MR. DARDEN: SO DO I UNDERSTAND YOU TO SAY,
DETECTIVE, THAT IN YOUR MIND YOU COULD HAVE ARRESTED MR.
SIMPSON AT THAT TIME?
A OH, ABSOLUTELY I COULD HAVE, YES.
MR. DARDEN: CAN I HAVE ONE MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: YOU REALIZED THAT THE DEFENDANT
WAS A CELEBRITY, DID YOU?
A YES.
MR. SHAPIRO: OBJECTION, LEADING.
THE COURT: OVERRULED.
Q BY MR. DARDEN: WHAT SIGNIFICANCE, IF ANY, DID
YOU ATTACH TO HIS CELEBRITY STATUS AT THAT TIME?
A CELEBRITY STATUS REALLY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
MY FEELINGS REGARDING ARRESTING OR FILING CRIMINAL CHARGES
ON SOMEONE. THAT MEANT NOTHING TO ME, THE FACT THAT HE WAS
A CELEBRITY.
WHAT I WAS INTERESTED IN WAS KNOWING THE FILING
POLICY, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CASE WAS A FILEABLE
CASE BEFORE THE ARREST WAS MADE.
Q IS THAT WHAT YOU DO IN ALL CASES, DETECTIVE?
A ABSOLUTELY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: YOU MENTIONED A MOMENT AGO THAT
HAD YOU ARRESTED MR. SIMPSON THAT YOU WOULD HAVE HAD TO
HAVE FILED A CASE WITHIN 48 HOURS; IS THAT CORRECT?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q YOU HAVE SENT BLOOD AND BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE TO
THE LAB, TO THE CRIME LAB IN THE PAST FOR ANALYSIS; IS THAT
RIGHT?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q AND IS THERE A STANDARD TIME OR STANDARD
TURN-AROUND TIME WHEN YOU SEND EVIDENCE TO THE CRIME LAB?
A NO. IT VARIES FROM CASE TO CASE. I HAVE
NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING BACK IN THAT AMOUNT OF TIME, IN MY
CAREER.
Q DID YOU EVER GET ANYTHING BACK THE SAME DAY?
A NEVER.
Q AND YOU KNEW THAT?
A I KNEW THAT.
Q NOW, DID YOU HAVE A FURTHER CONVERSATION WITH
MR. WEITZMAN AFTER YOU TOOK THE HANDCUFFS OFF THE
DEFENDANT?
A YES.
Q AND DID YOU ASK HIM TO DO SOMETHING?
A YES.
Q WHAT DID YOU ASK MR. WEITZMAN TO DO?
A TO FOLLOW ME TO PARKER CENTER.
Q WHY?
A HE WANTED TO BE WITH HIS CLIENT, MR. SIMPSON.
Q YOU WERE GOING TO TAKE MR. SIMPSON TO PARKER
CENTER?
A YES.
Q WAS HE UNDER ARREST?
A NO.
Q WAS HE FREE TO LEAVE?
A IF HE WOULD HAVE WANTED TO AT THAT POINT HE
COULD HAVE, YES.
Q HE WAS FREE TO LEAVE DESPITE YOUR BELIEF?
A I HAD ASKED HIM VOLUNTARILY TO ACCOMPANY ME TO
PARKER CENTER FOR AN INTERVIEW. HE AGREED TO.
MR. WEITZMAN WANTED TO BE WITH HIM. I ASKED
HIM TO FOLLOW ME TO PARKER CENTER. HE WAS NOT UNDER ARREST
AT THAT POINT.
Q AND DID YOU DRIVE THE DEFENDANT TO PARKER
CENTER?
A YES, SIR, I DID.
Q AND WAS HE IN HANDCUFFS DURING THAT DRIVE?
A HE WAS NOT.
Q BUT HE WAS A SUSPECT?
A YES.
Q HAVE YOU IN THE PAST DRIVEN OTHER MURDER
SUSPECTS TO THE POLICE STATION IN YOUR POLICE VEHICLE?
A YES, MANY TIMES.
Q AND DID YOU HANDCUFF THEM?
A SOME OF THEM; NOT ALL OF THEM.
Q DID MR. -- MR. WEITZMAN FOLLOW YOU AND THE
DEFENDANT TO PARKER CENTER?
A HE MET US AT PARKER CENTER, YES.
Q OKAY.
AND DID YOU HAVE A FURTHER CONVERSATION WITH
MR. WEITZMAN AT THAT TIME?
A I DID.
Q WHAT WAS THAT CONVERSATION?
A HE REQUESTED --
MR. SHAPIRO: OBJECTION. OBJECTION.
THE COURT: WHAT IS THE OBJECTION?
MR. SHAPIRO: HEARSAY.
THE COURT: SUSTAINED.
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DID YOU ASK MR. WEITZMAN TO DO
ANYTHING?
A MR. WEITZMAN ASKED ME TO DO SOMETHING.
Q OKAY. WHAT DID HE ASK YOU TO DO?
MR. SHAPIRO: OBJECTION, HEARSAY.
MR. DARDEN: IT IS A QUESTION, YOUR HONOR. IT IS NOT
OFFERED --
THE COURT: I'M GOING TO SUSTAIN THE OBJECTION UNLESS
YOU WANT TO BE HEARD.
MR. DARDEN: OKAY.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. WITH THE COURT REPORTER,
PLEASE.
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD AT THE BENCH:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
THE QUESTION -- THE QUESTION WAS WHAT DID --
ABOUT WHAT MR. WEITZMAN SAID TO DETECTIVE VANNATTER.
THE OBJECTION IS HEARSAY WHICH APPEARS TO BE
WELL TAKEN.
MR. DARDEN?
MR. DARDEN: OKAY. WELL, THE QUESTION IS WHAT, IF
ANYTHING, MR. WEITZMAN ASKED HIM TO DO IS THE QUESTION. IT
IS NOT OFFERED FOR THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER STATED.
QUESTIONS ARE NOT HEARSAY.
THE COURT: ARE YOU SAYING THAT IT IS OFFERED TO
EXPLAIN SUBSEQUENT ACTION?
MR. DARDEN: AND TO -- YEAH, AND FOR STATE OF MIND.
THE COURT: WHAT IS THE ANSWER GOING TO BE?
MR. DARDEN: THE ANSWER IS GOING TO BE THAT HE ASKED
FOR PERMISSION TO SPEAK WITH HIS CLIENT ALONE FOR SEVERAL
MINUTES, WHICH WAS GRANTED.
THE COURT: OKAY.
MR. DARDEN: AND HE IS GOING TO --
MR. SHAPIRO: MAY WE HAVE A MOMENT, PLEASE?
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN DEFENSE COUNSEL.)
MR. SHAPIRO: YOUR HONOR, MAY WE ASK THE COURT TO
INQUIRE WHAT THE FOLLOW-UP QUESTION WOULD BE, IF ANY, SO WE
DON'T HAVE TO COME UP HERE AGAIN?
THE COURT: FOLLOW-UP QUESTION?
MR. DARDEN: DID HE ALLOW HIM TIME ALONE WITH HIS
LAWYER.
MR. SHAPIRO: FOLLOW-UP AFTER THAT.
MR. COCHRAN: PUT THE STATEMENT IN.
MR. SHAPIRO: THAT IS WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THAT?
MR. DARDEN: I AM NOT ABOUT TO PUT THE STATEMENT IN,
IF THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT TO KNOW.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
AFTER THE -- AFTER THEY REQUIRE -- AFTER
WEITZMAN AND SIMPSON CONFER, THEN WHAT HAPPENS?
MR. DARDEN: WELL, WHAT HAPPENS IS THEY HAVE AN
INTERVIEW.
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
ARE YOU GOING TO BRING THAT OUT?
MR. DARDEN: WELL, THERE IS FURTHER CONVERSATION
ACTUALLY.
AFTER THAT HAPPENS THE DETECTIVE ASKED WEITZMAN
IF HE WOULD LIKE TO BE PRESENT DURING ANY SUBSEQUENT
INTERVIEW, WHICH WEITZMAN SAID NO, AND HE ASKED WEITZMAN IF
HE WOULD LIKE THE INTERVIEW TAPED.
MR. SHAPIRO: WE WILL WITHDRAW OUR OBJECTION.
THE COURT: OKAY.
MR. DARDEN: AUDIOTAPED.
THE COURT: OKAY.
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT:)
THE COURT: COUNSEL, MR. DARDEN, PROCEED.
MR. DARDEN: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
Q DETECTIVE VANNATTER, YOU TESTIFIED A MOMENT AGO
THAT MR. WEITZMAN ASKED YOU FOR SOMETHING OR TO DO
SOMETHING?
A YES.
Q AND WHAT DID HE ASK?
A HE ASKED TO SPEAK WITH HIS CLIENT AND FOR ME TO
PROVIDE A ROOM FOR HIM TO SPEAK WITH HIM IN PRIVACY.
Q AND DID YOU PROVIDE MR. WEITZMAN AND THE
DEFENDANT A ROOM WHERE THEY COULD SPEAK PRIVATELY?
A YES, MR. WEITZMAN, MR. SIMPSON AND ANOTHER MAN.
Q AND WHO WAS THAT OTHER MAN?
A AN ATTORNEY, I LATER LEARNED, SKIP TAFT.
Q MR. SIMPSON'S BUSINESS LAWYER?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
Q SO ALL THREE MEN, THE DEFENDANT AND MR. TAFT
AND MR. WEITZMAN, WENT INTO A ROOM?
A YES.
Q DID THEY CLOSE THE DOOR?
A YES.
Q DID YOU WAIT FOR THEM?
A YES.
Q WHERE DID YOU WAIT FOR MR. WEITZMAN AND MR.
TAFT AND THE DEFENDANT?
A IN THE RECEPTION AREA OF ROBBERY/HOMICIDE
DIVISION.
Q DID YOU GUARD THE DOOR, THE DOOR -- THE DOOR
LEADING -- THE DOOR LEADING TO THE ROOM THAT THEY WERE IN?
A I COULD SEE THE DOOR, YES. I WAS IN THE
SECRETARY'S AREA. THE INTERVIEW ROOMS ARE ALONG ONE WALL
OF THAT AREA.
Q OKAY.
WAS THE DEFENDANT HANDCUFFED AT THAT TIME?
A NO.
Q WAS HE UNDER ARREST?
A NO.
Q HOW LONG DID MR. WEITZMAN AND MR. TAFT AND THE
DEFENDANT REMAIN IN THAT ROOM?
A PROBABLY TWENTY TO THIRTY MINUTES.
Q DID YOU INTERRUPT THEM AT ANY TIME?
A I DID NOT.
Q DID YOU EVER ASK THEM TO HURRY UP?
A NO.
Q YOU NEVER ASKED THEM TO HURRY UP AND CONCLUDE
THEIR CONVERSATION OR WHATEVER IT WAS THEY WERE DOING IN
THERE?
A NO.
Q DID YOU OVERHEAR ANY PART OR ANY PORTION OF
ANY CONVERSATION THE DEFENDANT HAD WITH HIS LAWYERS?
A NO.
Q DID YOU ATTEMPT TO?
A NO.
Q AT SOME POINT DID THE DEFENDANT AND MR. TAFT
AND MR. WEITZMAN EXIT THE ROOM?
A MR. WEITZMAN AND MR. TAFT DID. SIMPSON
REMAINED IN THE ROOM.
Q HAD YOU TOLD HIM EARLIER TO REMAIN IN THE ROOM?
A WELL, I THINK THAT WAS UNDERSTOOD, THAT WE WERE
GOING TO INTERVIEW HIM, YES.
Q NOW, WHEN MR. WEITZMAN AND MR. TAFT CAME OUT OF
THAT ROOM, DID YOU HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THEM?
A YES.
Q WHAT WAS THAT CONVERSATION?
A THAT WE WANTED TO INTERVIEW HIS CLIENT.
Q AND DID YOU MAKE ANY OFFERS AT ALL TO MR.
WEITZMAN OR MR. TAFT AT THAT TIME?
A YES.
Q AND WHAT WAS THAT?
A I INVITED MR. WEITZMAN TO STAY IF HE WANTED TO.
Q DID YOU EVER TELL MR. WEITZMAN THAT HE COULD
NOT BE PRESENT DURING ANY INTERVIEW OR CONVERSATION YOU
MIGHT HAVE WITH THE DEFENDANT?
A I DID NOT.
Q AND WHEN YOU TOLD MR. WEITZMAN THAT HE COULD
REMAIN, IF HE WANTED TO, WHAT DID HE SAY?
A HE SAID HE DIDN'T NEED TO. THE ONLY PARAMETERS
HE WANTED WAS FOR ME TO TAPE-RECORD THE CONVERSATION.
Q MR. WEITZMAN SAY WHERE HE WAS GOING?
A YEAH. HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO GO TO LUNCH.
Q AND WAS MR. TAFT PRESENT DURING THIS
CONVERSATION?
A YES.
Q AND WHAT DID MR. WEITZMAN DO AFTER HE TOLD YOU
THAT HE WAS GOING TO GO TO LUNCH?
A I OBSERVED HIM AND MR. TAFT LEAVE THE AREA THAT
I WAS IN HEADED TOWARD THE EXIT OF THE FLOOR OF THE
BUILDING.
Q HOW LONG WAS MR. SIMPSON, THE DEFENDANT, AT
PARKER CENTER THAT AFTERNOON, IF YOU KNOW?
A THREE TO THREE AND A HALF HOURS, APPROXIMATELY.
Q AND WHAT TIME DID YOU AND THE DEFENDANT ARRIVE
AT PARKER CENTER, IF YOU RECALL?
A I BELIEVE IT WAS -- I BELIEVE IT WAS AROUND
12:40, 12:45, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
Q WHAT TIME DID MR. SIMPSON LEAVE PARKER CENTER
THAT DAY?
A I BELIEVE 3:30, THE AREA OF 3:30, SOMETHING
LIKE THAT.
Q AND WAS THE MEDIA PRESENT OUTSIDE PARKER CENTER
WHEN YOU ARRIVED?
A YES.
Q AND WERE THEY PRESENT WHEN MR. SIMPSON LEFT?
A YES.
Q AND WHEN MR. SIMPSON LEFT PARKER CENTER, WAS HE
IN POLICE CUSTODY?
A NO.
Q WAS HE HANDCUFFED?
A NO.
Q DID HE LEAVE WITH YOU?
A NO.
Q WHO DID HE LEAVE WITH?
A MR. WEITZMAN.
Q IF WE CAN GO BACK A MOMENT TO THAT POINT IN
TIME IN WHICH YOU REMOVED THE HANDCUFFS FROM THE DEFENDANT.
AT THAT TIME DID YOU SEE THE DEFENDANT'S HAND?
A YES.
Q DID YOU NOTICE ANYTHING UNUSUAL?
A YES.
Q AND WHAT DID YOU NOTICE?
A THAT HE HAD A BANDAGE ON THE MIDDLE FINGER OF
HIS LEFT HAND ON THE UPPER KNUCKLE OF THE MIDDLE FINGER.
Q AND DID YOU NOTE TO OBSERVE ANY INJURY TO THAT
FINGER AT THAT TIME?
A NOT AT THAT TIME. I DID SUBSEQUENT TO THAT,
AFTER ARRIVING AT PARKER CENTER.
Q OKAY.
WELL, WHAT SIGNIFICANCE, IF ANY, DID YOU ATTACH
TO YOUR INITIAL OBSERVATION OF THE BANDAGE?
A IT APPEARED THAT HE HAD AN INJURED KNUCKLE ON
THE LEFT MIDDLE FINGER OF HIS LEFT HAND.
Q DID YOU CONSIDER THAT SIGNIFICANT AT ALL?
A OH, I CERTAINLY DID, YES.
Q AND WHAT -- WHAT SIGNIFICANCE DID YOU ATTACH TO
THAT INJURY ON THE DEFENDANT'S LEFT HAND?
MR. SHAPIRO: OBJECTION, IRRELEVANT.
THE COURT: OVERRULED.
THE WITNESS: WELL, GOING BACK TO THE ORIGINAL CRIME
SCENE AT BUNDY, SEEING THE DISTINCT SINGLE SET OF
SHOEPRINTS, BLOOD SHOEPRINTS LEADING AWAY WITH BLOOD DROPS
ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SHOEPRINTS AND THEN TRACKING THE
BLOOD TRAIL BY VEHICLE TO ROCKINGHAM, PICKING UP THE BLOOD
TRAIL AT ROCKINGHAM THAT WENT RIGHT INTO HIS HOUSE, IT
WOULD APPEAR THAT -- THAT HE HAD THE INJURY THAT WAS --
THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED THOSE BLOOD DROPS ON THE LEFT SIDE
OF THE BLOODY FOOTPRINTS.
Q DURING THE TIME THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS AT
PARKER CENTER DID YOU PHOTOGRAPH HIS HANDS?
A I DID.
Q OKAY. DID YOU PHOTOGRAPH HIS HAND -- HIS LEFT
HAND?
A YES.
Q AND DID YOU DO THAT PERSONALLY OR DID YOU HAVE
SOMEONE DO IT FOR YOU?
A I HAD A PHOTOGRAPHER DO IT.
MR. DARDEN: MAY I HAVE ONE MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: NOW, PRIOR TO PHOTOGRAPHING THE
DEFENDANT'S LEFT HAND DID HE REMOVE THE BANDAGE?
A YES. THE BANDAGE WAS TAKEN OFF.
Q OKAY. DID YOU TAKE IT OFF OR DID HE TAKE IT
OFF?
A HE DID.
Q OKAY. WERE YOU ABLE TO OBSERVE THE INJURY AT
THAT TIME?
A YES.
Q CAN YOU DESCRIBE IT FOR US?
A YES. IT WAS A -- HIS KNUCKLE APPEARED TO BE
SWOLLEN AND IT IS THE UPPER KNUCKLE OF THE MIDDLE FINGER
OF HIS LEFT HAND, APPEARED TO BE SWOLLEN AND THERE APPEARED
TO BE A LACERATION THAT RUN UP AND DOWN ACROSS THE KNUCKLE,
AND THEN DIRECTLY BELOW THAT TOWARD THE FIRST KNUCKLE THERE
APPEARED TO BE A SMALLER LACERATION THAT RAN ACROSS THE
FINGER AND DOWN.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DID YOU TAKE A SAMPLE OF THE
DEFENDANT'S BLOOD THAT AFTERNOON?
A I HAD IT DONE. I DIDN'T DO IT, BUT I HAD IT
DONE.
Q OKAY. AND WHO DID YOU HAVE DO IT, DETECTIVE?
A THE ON-DUTY REGISTERED NURSE AT THE JAIL
DISPENSARY AT PARKER CENTER.
Q IS THERE A JAIL LOCATED AT PARKER CENTER?
A YES.
Q YOU NEVER PLACED THE DEFENDANT IN THAT JAIL?
A NO, I DID NOT. WELL, I THINK I SHOULD QUALIFY
THAT.
NO, I DID NOT THAT DAY ON THE 13TH.
Q THE 13TH WOULD BE MONDAY; IS THAT CORRECT?
A THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
Q AND CAN YOU TELL US WHAT -- WHAT YOU SAW THE
NURSE DO IN THE JAIL DISPENSARY, THAT IS, RELATIVE TO THE
TAKING OF THE DEFENDANT'S BLOOD?
A THE NURSE FIRST PREPARED A FORM, WHICH WAS AN
AUTHORIZATION FOR MR. SIMPSON'S SIGNATURE. HE SIGNED AND
AGREED TO GIVE THE BLOOD SAMPLE.
THE NURSE TOOK A SYRINGE FROM HIS EQUIPMENT AND
DREW A SAMPLE OF BLOOD.
MR. DARDEN: MAY I HAVE ONE MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
MR. DARDEN: MAY I CONFER WITH MR. SHAPIRO FOR ONE
MOMENT, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
AND DEFENSE COUNSEL.)
MR. SHAPIRO: MAY WE APPROACH, YOUR HONOR?
THE COURT: CERTAINLY.
(A CONFERENCE WAS HELD AT THE
BENCH, NOT REPORTED.)
(THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE
HELD IN OPEN COURT:)
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, COUNSEL.
MR. DARDEN, DO YOU WANT TO SEE IF YOU CAN WRAP
IT UP?
MR. DARDEN: CERTAINLY, YOUR HONOR.
PEOPLE'S NEXT IN ORDER.
THE COURT: 123.
MR. DARDEN: 123.
WE HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH, YOUR HONOR.
(PEO'S 123 FOR ID = PHOTOGRAPH)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: DETECTIVE, SHOWING YOU THE
PHOTOGRAPH MARKED PEOPLE'S 123 FOR IDENTIFICATION, DO YOU
RECOGNIZE THAT PHOTOGRAPH?
A YES, SIR, I DO.
Q WAS THAT THE PHOTOGRAPH YOU CAUSED TO BE TAKEN
ON JUNE 13TH?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q THAT PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTS THE LEFT INDEX FINGER?
A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q OF THE DEFENDANT?
A YES.
(DISCUSSION HELD OFF THE RECORD
BETWEEN THE DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEYS.)
Q BY MR. DARDEN: I'M SORRY, MIDDLE FINGER?
A MIDDLE FINGER.
Q MIDDLE FINGER?
A MIDDLE FINGER, YES.
Q DON'T SHOW ME; JUST TELL ME.
IS THAT HOW IT LOOKED THAT DAY?
A YES, IT IS.
MR. DARDEN: THANK YOU, DETECTIVE.
IS THIS A GOOD TIME?
THE COURT: ALL RIGHT.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE OUR
RECESS AT THIS TIME.
PLEASE REMEMBER MY ADMONITION TO YOU. DON'T
DISCUSS THE CASE AMONGST YOURSELVES, DON'T FORM ANY
OPINIONS ABOUT THE CASE, DO NOT ALLOW ANYBODY TO
COMMUNICATE WITH YOU ABOUT THE CASE OR CONDUCT ANY
DELIBERATIONS ABOUT THE MATTER UNTIL THE MATTER HAS BEEN
SUBMITTED TO YOU.
DETECTIVE LANGE, YOU ARE ORDERED TO RETURN
MONDAY MORNING, 9:00 A.M.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, JUST SO YOU KNOW, THIS
AFTERNOON THE COURT IS GOING TO BE ON SESSION ON OTHER
MATTERS REGARDING THIS CASE, I ALSO HAVE ANOTHER CASE ON MY
CALENDAR, SO WE WILL BE HERE WORKING.
SO YOU HAVE A NICE WEEKEND AND WE WILL SEE YOU
MONDAY MORNING.
THE WITNESS: DETECTIVE VANNATTER.
THE COURT: DETECTIVE VANNATTER, I'M SORRY. I LIKED
THE LANGE GUY. HE WAS HERE SO LONG.
ALL RIGHT. SEE YOU MONDAY MORNING.
(AT 12:00 P.M. THE NOON RECESS
WAS TAKEN UNTIL 1:30 P.M. OF
THE SAME DAY.)
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT NO. 103 HON. LANCE A. ITO, JUDGE
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
)
PLAINTIFF, )
)
) VS.
) NO. BA097211
)
ORENTHAL JAMES SIMPSON, )
)
)
DEFENDANT. )
REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
FRIDAY, MARCH 17, 1995
VOLUME 109
PAGES 19234 THROUGH 19305, INCLUSIVE
(PAGES 19228 THROUGH 19233, INCLUSIVE, SEALED)
(PAGES 19306 THROUGH 19360, INCLUSIVE, SEALED)
APPEARANCES: (SEE PAGE 2)
JANET M. MOXHAM, CSR #4588
CHRISTINE M. OLSON, CSR #2378
OFFICIAL REPORTERS
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE: GIL GARCETTI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
BY: MARCIA R. CLARK, WILLIAM W.
HODGMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. DARDEN,
CHERI A. LEWIS, ROCKNE P. HARMON,
GEORGE W. CLARKE, SCOTT M. GORDON
LYDIA C. BODIN, HANK M. GOLDBERG,
ALAN YOCHELSON AND DARRELL S.
MAVIS, DEPUTIES
18-000 CRIMINAL COURTS BUILDING
210 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
FOR THE DEFENDANT: ROBERT L. SHAPIRO, ESQUIRE
SARA L. CAPLAN, ESQUIRE
2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS
19TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
JOHNNIE L. COCHRAN, JR., ESQUIRE
BY: CARL E. DOUGLAS, ESQUIRE
SHAWN SNIDER CHAPMAN, ESQUIRE
4929 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
SUITE 1010
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90010
GERALD F. UELMEN, ESQUIRE
ROBERT KARDASHIAN, ESQUIRE
ALAN DERSHOWITZ, ESQUIRE
F. LEE BAILEY, ESQUIRE
BARRY SCHECK, ESQUIRE
ROBERT D. BLASIER, ESQUIRE
I N D E X
INDEX FOR VOLUME 109 PAGES 19234 - 19305
-----------------------------------------------------
DAY DATE SESSION PAGE VOL.
FRIDAY MARCH 17, 1995 A.M. 19234 109
-----------------------------------------------------
LEGEND:
MS. CLARK - MC
MR. HODGMAN - H
MR. DARDEN D
MR. KAHN - K
MR. GOLDBERG - GB
MR. GORDON - G
MR. SHAPIRO - S
MR. COCHRAN - C
MR. DOUGLAS - CD
MR. BAILEY - B
MR. UELMEN - U
MR. SCHECK - BS
MR. NEUFELD - N
-----------------------------------------------------
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX OF WITNESSES
PEOPLE'S
WITNESSES DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS VOL.
VANNATTER, 109
PHILIP
(RESUMED) 19432D
-------------------------------------------------------
ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF WITNESSES
PEOPLE'S
WITNESSES DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS VOL.
VANNATTER, 109
PHILIP
(RESUMED) 19432D
EXHIBITS
PEOPLE'S FOR IN EXHIBIT
IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
PAGE VOL. PAGE VOL.
118 - VIDEOTAPE OF 19237 109
DETECTIVE VANNATTER'S DRIVE FROM
ROCKINGHAM TO BUNDY
119 - VIDEOTAPE OF 19237 109
DETECTIVE VANNATTER'S DRIVE FROM
BUNDY TO ROCKINGHAM
120 - POSTERBOARD 19249 109
ENTITLED "BLOOD TRAIL AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM"
WITH 22 PHOTOGRAPHS DESIGNATED AS A THROUGH K
120-A - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM WITH THE REAR OF A WHITE
BRONCO VEHICLE
120-B - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
AN LAPD RULER AND A RED SPOT ON THE GROUND
AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM
120-C - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM
120-D - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
THE GROUND AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM
120-E - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A CLOSE-UP OF THE GROUND AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM
120-F - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A WIDE VIEW OF THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM
120-G - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A CLOSE-UP OF THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM WITH THE LETTER "C"
120-H - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A RED SPOT ON THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM WITH THE NUMBER "7"
120-I - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A WIDE VIEW OF THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM
EXHIBITS
(CONTINUED)
PEOPLE'S FOR IN EXHIBIT
IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
PAGE VOL. PAGE VOL.
120-J - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
A CLOSE-UP OF THE DRIVEWAY AT 360 NORTH
ROCKINGHAM WITH NUMBER "8," A RED SPOT
AND AN LAPD RULER
120-K - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19249 109
THE ENTRYWAY AT 360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM
121 - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19256 109
A CLOSE-UP OF A RED DROP WITH THE NUMBER 112 AT
360 NORTH ROCKINGHAM
122 - POSTERBOARD 19259 109
ENTITLED "BRONCO EVIDENCE" WITH TWO PHOTOGRAPHS
122-A - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19259 109
A DOOR OF A BRONCO VEHICLE
122-B - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19259 109
THE CONSOLE OF A BRONCO VEHICLE
123 - PHOTOGRAPH OF 19303 109
THE MIDDLE FINGER OF THE DEFENDANT
??